Yandex is stupid– I called this become. But life shows that anyone who has worked on the Internet for more than 5 years once comes a moment when, like Zadornov, he calls out, pushing away from the table with his chair: “Yandex, you are stupid!!!”
Check the queries and see how many people come to a similar conclusion every month:
Yandex is stupid– 1,668 people per month.
Yandex you are stupid– 715 people.
The stupidest Yandex– 138 (if you choose the dumbest search engine among the great four Yandex, Bing, Google and Yahoo!, then, as they say in Odessa, “Yes, Yandex is the dumbest!”).
Yandex Google is stupid– 106. But here I will argue, because if Google is forced into this list, then the question arises: isn’t the webmaster himself creating a low-quality, shitty site that is equally negatively perceived by all search engines?
« Yandex you are dumber than Google“- I agree with those 99 people who argue in a similar way.
Well, then comes the cry from the heart:
« Yandex you stupid bastard!!!" - 74 people are crying out about this.
And after him:
« Why is Yandex stupid??»
Why is Yandex stupid? I can name 10 reasons right off the bat:
1. TIC is a legalized racket that forces any webmaster to buy left-handed links, otherwise he will not get to the top. When Yandex itself claims that the only thing that matters is how much you write, not taking into account the behavioral factor: time on the site, user activity, depth of views, number of comments, building search results only on the TIC is somehow hypocritical. Do you agree?
2. The story with copy-paste - create a bot that will find copy-paste and automatically make invisible links to the site from which the text was stolen - is it really that difficult? And everyone would immediately stop stealing, knowing that by posting the stolen text, you automatically give the TIC to the person you stole from.
3. And secondly, it’s just as easy to understand where the original source is and where it is. But no, Yandex stupidly does not pay attention to this, allowing thieves to get to the TOP, and those whose text was stolen hang out in position 101.
6. Of all the search engines mentioned, Yandex is the dumbest, and this point (I have no doubt about it) does not require much proof.
7. Yandex, you are dumber than Google - another point that I accept without much controversy, loving Google more. And if so, then I do not agree with those who say “Yandex Google is stupid”, tarring everyone with the same brush. At the same time, I regret that our fellow citizens do not use Yahoo! – the most honest and categorical of search engines.
8. Another explanation why Yandex is stupid is an attempt to assign a certain regional affiliation to each site. And as soon as a blogger from St. Petersburg writes “today in Ulan-Ude such and such took place” and until you sing to technical support and prove that you are not a deer, your site will be assigned to one that has nothing to do with you Buryatia.
9. Those who suffered by writing the word “” in their article, as a result of which they were either blacklisted or labeled “18+,” can also tell you a lot about how Yandex stupidly leaked their resources.
10. Well, you can fill out this item yourself if you came here by the queries “Yandex, you’re stupid,” “Yandex is the dumbest,” “Yandex, you’re a stupid bastard,” or “why is Yandex stupid.”
Earn money on VKontakte Having just a page there, try it, here are the INSTRUCTIONS. Check it out and get started!
A cool title for this post. I was just wondering what to call this note and dug into wordstat.yandex.ru.
It turns out there are a lot of interesting queries related to Yandex and with a large number of impressions per month.
For example, exact occurrence "Yandex sucker" more than 3800. And the cool thing is that there are not many pages in the search results that are clearly optimized for this keyword.
Is Yandek a sucker or not?
I still decided not to go after Yasha and didn’t change it; I changed the key phrase a little and it turned out that Yandex is not a sucker, but at the same time the request is very tasty in terms of competition.
I’m just wondering if people will come to this article from Yandex if I optimize it a little. But this article is not only about this bad word and about some interesting points when optimizing websites. This will be discussed further.
About closing links
On my sites, I usually close links to noindex and nofollow so as not to transfer the weight of the page to anyone. Where it turns out I use a redirect, and in dle there is a wonderful leech attribute that makes external links internal. But where links can be removed altogether - I remove them. Often on different blogs there are discussions in the comments about whether it is worth making a dofollow blog? My opinion is that it’s still not worth it, because you constantly check the links so that they don’t run any bad sites, and you don’t want to turn your blog into a link dump.
I would like to draw your attention once again to the fact that Yandex is not a sucker, and also that links that are closed in noindex and nofollow lose weight. He goes nowhere, but still goes. And this is a significant disadvantage in promoting the desired page. Moreover, it is not a fact that these tags will be taken into account constantly. Perhaps one day Yandex or Google will decide not to take them into account, and then what? In general, this issue needs to be taken seriously when creating and promoting a website.
Something I didn't mention is that Yandex sucker, because I am tailoring this article to this key phrase. True, this article contains a link to another resource, which will affect its position in search results, but nothing. No longer available.
Or maybe Yandex is a sucker?
This is what I will say when a site is assembled from copy-paste, but at the same time the copy-paste is mixed with other content on the site, plus key phrases are often used in the page frame, and frankly the site is almost like a doorway, Yandex is acting like a sucker and accepts such a site as high-quality, regarding the content as unique. But for this it is desirable large number links to the site and Titz.
- Let's summarize.
- 1. I used the H1 tag once on the page with the key phrase “Yandex is not a sucker.”
- 2. Almost the same phrase was mentioned twice in the H2 tag.
- 3. The tags strong, i, em, as well as “pure” phrases were used several times.
In general, in about a month I will write directly in this article about whether anyone came to my blog by the title of this article or not, after entering Yasha’s index. Well, I’ll post about the positions if it gets into the top 100.
See you soon.
P.S.
Google article in Top 10.
10.09 - one person came in using the request “Yandex suckers”
Report dated 01/12/12.
An article in Yandex is in the Top 3, 1-2 people a day come in for this request.
Report dated 07/03/12.
The article in Yandex is in the Top 2, 3-4 people come in per day.
People often come to this article using the phrases:
- Yandex Google called you a sucker
- Google said that Yandex is a sucker
- Yandex you're a sucker
There are many users roaming the Internet who love to search for and create various jokes. At one time, this joke appeared: when the query “Google you honey” was entered into Google, the TITLE “I’m not your honey, you stupid bastard” appeared in the second place in the search results. Now this answer, thanks to the efforts of the young blogger Alexander Baryshevsky, appears in first place.
This is the answer from Google to the query “Google you honey”
The same joke worked for Yandex, i.e. If you now type in Yandex “Yandex you are a sweetheart”, “I am not your sweetheart, you stupid bastard” will appear in the search results again.
The trick also worked with Yandex
If you use the wordstst.yandex.ru service, you can see that users make a lot of stupid requests containing the words “Yandex, you’re a honey”:
- Yandex you are a honey but Google is better;
- Yandex I love you honey;
- Google said that Yandex is a sweetheart, etc. etc.
Users make a lot of stupid requests containing the words “Yandex, you’re a honey”
Such requests are, on the one hand, low-competition (NC), and on the other hand, they have sufficient frequency so that they can receive traffic.
Conclusion: Such “stupid” queries can easily get traffic to a website or blog. Another question is how convertible such traffic will be.
In order to generate income from traffic in the form of clicks on the same contextual advertising, it is advisable to write articles talking about any goods or services. Users click on advertising in such articles more willingly than in an article “nothing at all.” For those who want to properly promote their website or blog, we recommend reading the article
Hello, dear readers of the blog site. I want to say a few words about how optimizers joke. If we exaggerate greatly, then on some request with certain selfish interests. Usually this is done in order to raise your website or a client’s website to the Top (the first ten answers of Yandex or Google). Everything here is clear and prosaic (loot rules the world). But life would be boring if we stopped doing stupid things...
Well, you must agree, what’s the point of creating a search bomb “Yandex you’re a honey” with promotion to the Top of the site with the answer “I’m not your honey, s----a t----ya.” After all, it’s rude (possibly labor-intensive), but most of the audience for whom this joke is intended (school kids) will be very amused. Oh, look, Yandex can swear. Cool...
But it doesn't matter whether the joke is funny or not. Another thing is important - this clearly demonstrates that manipulating the search results is not so difficult, however, if the request is not very competitive. Those. need to come up with some provoking request and promote a funny answer to the Top at him. As soon as this becomes the property of a bored schoolboy, the request will instantly gain popularity and everyone will advise each other to enter something like “Yandex (Google) you honey (deer)” into the search bar and laugh at one of the first answers in the search results.
You know what? And this can be quite interesting. So much so that I (who already have a son who is almost past the age of “school age”) decided to write a post about it. Let's see how well developed our optimizers' sense of humor is and what they could and can boast about now. Curious? Otherwise...
How did Yandex become a honey and why is Google better?
Actually, you can find the answer “how to do this” by going to the site, which will first in Yandex and Google results for the query “Yandex, you’re a sweetheart”.
There, the “enterprising comrade” explains that he created a page with a title that will be the answer to this question. But for this page to be displayed in Yandex results specified request, he used it several times in the text and even highlighted it in bold.
Because There wasn’t much competition for it at that time, so the article remarkably jumped to the Top and even eventually took first place. We give a standing ovation, because now this phrase is requested about sixty thousand times in Yandex and the “joker” site receives decent traffic.
There are also variations of this request, such as the one given in the title “Yandex you are a honey, but Google is better”, “Yandex you are a deer”, “Yandex you love me”, etc. Now you know the secret and, if you wish and have sufficient creativity and knowledge in SEO, you can repeat all this or even surpass it. For me, simply stating a fact is enough.
This was an example when a joke gave a very good return in the form of additional traffic to the site and in the form of satisfying the ambitions of the author who invented and implemented it. But often more successful (in my opinion) jokes and gags that were introduced into search results Yandex or Google, brought their authors nothing but moral satisfaction. It is precisely to such enthusiasts, it seems to me, that one should take off one’s hat.
Wow Yandex jokes
Next, I want to give a number of examples that are still “living”, and most often have already died in God. search jokes of Yandex and Google, which were implemented out of nothing more than a naked desire to laugh and give other network users a hearty laugh. Agree, when the search engine itself makes jokes, it’s much funnier (and more natural) than demotivators, etc. Smesharikov.
- This joke clearly shows the attitude of the “celestials from the world of SEO” towards those who are hooked on:
- True, now the previous request no longer gives Contact in the first place, but there is also a request that still works great in Yandex:
- Here is also an unexpectedly persistent answer to the seemingly difficult question “worst search engine”:
I can't imagine how you can achieve such a result, unless it really is an opinion search engine Yandex about a former competitor (already died two years ago).
- Jokes are found not only in the search results, but sometimes also in the advertising blocks that are shown there:
- Again, a lot of jokes are promoted (it’s hard to imagine that at least a couple of people entered the query “what to do if Voldemort washes himself with my shampoo”) and in the search suggestions of Yandex and Google:
- There are a couple of frequently entered queries on the topic of toilets: “what will happen if you throw a crowbar into a train toilet at full speed” and “What should I do if my toilet is dancing.” Apparently someone promoted them, but the essence of this idea is now somewhat vague Although the originality of the questions alone can give you an A.
Google jokes
- I, of course, perfectly understand the guys who, living overseas and not being able to type in the Russian keyboard, therefore write their messages on Russian-language forums, social networks and blogs in transliteration. How do you feel about this? Personally, I constantly “stumble” over this, and when such a “wonderful” hint was given on Google for this, I simply couldn’t hold back my laughter:
Apparently this is someone from the Russian team Google search I was joking, but then everything was fixed.
- Google is somewhat pessimistic about the mental development of the vast majority of our planet:
- Previously, when searching for “delusion generator,” Google returned the site of its direct competitor (Yandex) in second place.
Sometimes, when searching, you come across results that make no sense. Regular users, I assume that in such a case they will enter another query, but users like us who are mired in searching and search engine optimization, continue to scratch their heads.
I collected these ten search results over the past couple of months and decided to post them on the blog so that a smart team could participate in the solution.
#10 – Google's Favorite University
#9 – Wikipedia as a safe search
I was hoping they read the text inside the Flash file, but since that's completely inaccessible, I'm guessing they just paid a lot of attention to everything with “attractive” anchor text. 🙂
#5 – Your website is not here
#3 – Where is a good place to get married?
I'm a busy person, and I have to fuss about the wedding a lot. So I was looking marriage license seattle, wa.
I was stopped by a government agency recommended by this card, I can say that it is good place to purchase a wedding license in Seattle. However, why no address is shown (even if you go to the map, you can’t find the address) and why the link leads to the wrong page (the correct URL is Seattle.gov or Metrokc.gov), I could not understand.
#2 – One of these domain queries is not like the others
It is not entirely clear why Google provides URL information upon request.
In general, a query on any other domain will return standard results, many of which include site links. Since domain queries are quite popular, I imagine there are a lot of confused users out there wondering why About was getting such weird results.
#1 – Math and the Beatles
Now I'm well aware that a week technically contains seven days, but sometimes there just isn't enough time, especially when you're in love. So the Beatles gave us Eight Days a Week... But Google says something strange about this.
It’s clear that this is 8 divided by 7, but I can’t understand why the calculator came out.
You can send comments or observations about unexplained phenomena in Google search results to Rand Fishkin's blog.